Multi-unit restaurant analytics: compare locations and decide what to review

Marty starts with a paid Cash & Profit Review. Using authorized access to existing restaurant data, our team compares labor, voids, comps, food cost, and deposits across locations in scope, then documents exceptions, proposed actions, and supporting evidence. Optional manager follow-through can be discussed after the Review.

Common questions

What should I look for in software designed to find multi-location losses?

Look for location-level comparison, each store's own history, operating context, and evidence for any proposed action. Before judging an exception, compare concept, hours, sales mix, and service coverage against a comparable daypart. Marty's paid Review applies that model across locations; optional manager follow-through can be discussed after the Review.

See what Marty is built to do

How is operational analytics different from my P&L or accounting reports?

Accounting and P&L reports reconcile financial results by period. Operational analytics examines the operating signals behind those results, labor pacing, void patterns, deposit ties, and comp rates. Marty's paid Review works alongside accounting rather than replacing it; any optional manager follow-through depends on the authorized data available.

How Marty uses existing reports

How much revenue do restaurant groups typically lose to controllable costs?

There is no loss percentage this page can establish for your group. Review the group’s own records, distinguish unexplained differences from confirmed losses, and keep estimates separate from verified recovery. The paid Cash & Profit Review is scoped around your locations, systems, and available data.

Review the location-comparison process

What the Cash & Profit Review includes

Within seven days, you receive ranked findings by dollars and location, evidence supporting each finding, proposed owners, recommended fixes, a 30-day action plan, and a live leadership readout. You can run the plan with your own team; managed continuation is optional.

How do I compare restaurant locations that use different systems?

Start with a small set of questions you want the comparison to answer. Then agree on the reporting period and definitions for each measure. Check whether sales include discounts or refunds, which costs are included in labor, and when each system last updated.

List the systems, reporting dates, definitions, and missing records.

Compare sales, labor cost, and worked hours for the same period.

Review voids, comps, and deposits against the original records and the manager's explanation.

Choose one evidenced issue, assign an owner, and set a review date.

A higher labor percentage is a question, not a conclusion

A higher labor percentage does not automatically mean a location is overstaffed. Check sales changes, role coverage, opening hours, service needs, and worked hours before deciding what needs review.

Where the paid Review fits

Scheduling and accounting remain separate requirements. The paid Cash & Profit Review examines authorized records and documents findings, supporting evidence, and proposed actions. Your team can run the plan. Optional monitoring and manager follow-through can be discussed afterward, with timing dependent on authorized data.

Keep findings and outcomes separate

An unexplained difference is not automatically a confirmed loss. Keep suspected losses, estimated savings, and verified recovery separate, and leave a result unverified when the supporting records are incomplete.